From 1 to 12 of 112 item(s).
Escopo da Prática de Enfermagem na Atenção Primária à Saúde: definindo o caminho a seguir
Bruna Moreno-Dias, Edwin Vicente C. Bolastig, Eduardo Benjamín Puertas-Donoso.
Rumo à eliminação da tuberculose na América Latina: oportunidades por meio da cooperação em rede
Erica Chimara, Pedro Almeida Silva, Kleydson Bonfim Andrade, Andrea Villarino, Gabriela Gago, Ricard...
O papel estratégico da Enfermagem no Programa Brasil Saudável para o enfrentamento das doenças determinadas socialmente
Ethel Leonor Maciel, Elton Carlos de Almeida.
Publicação científica em enfermagem: o papel dos autores, do periódico e do processo de editoração
Maria Lucia do Carmo Cruz Robazzi, Regina Aparecida Garcia de Lima, Maria Lúcia Zanetti, Sueli Apar...
Influência de diferentes modalidades de aprendizagem no estado acadêmico e psicológico de estudantes universitários de enfermagem
Marta San-Antolín, César Calvo-Lobo.
Open-access Procedimentos invasivos de enfermagem: avanço dos resultados do tratamento com abordagens inovadoras
Sara Mogedano-Cruz, Carlos Romero-Morales.
Enfermagem e a crise climática - o chamado da COP30 para a saúde na América Latina
Ethel Leonor Maciel.
“Cuidado seguro para todo recém-nascido e toda criança”: a segurança do paciente como prioridade desde o início
Mavilde Luz Gonçalves Pedreira, Aline Santa Cruz Belela-Anacleto.
Alterações climáticas: liderança em Enfermagem em situações de catástrofe
Eunice da Conceição Gatinho Pires, Maria Adriana Pereira Henriques, Paulo Jorge Nogueira, Miguel A...
O uso da Inteligência Artificial Generativa na Comunicação Científica
Lilian Nassi-Calò
Eficácia de mensagens de texto na adesão às práticas de prevenção de COVID-19: um estudo quasi-experimental
Vinicius Lino de Souza Neto, Sheila Coelho Ramalho Vasconcelos Morais, Rafaela Batista dos Santos Pe...
Objective: to analyze the effectiveness of messages sent by cell phone on adherence to the use of masks, hand hygiene and social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: a multicenter quasi-experimental clinical trial conducted in four Brazilian universities between July and October 2020. The sample consisted of 429 people from different Brazilian cities who received messages every two days for seven weeks about individual protection measures. Adherence to the measures was analyzed by an instrument developed by the researchers of the main center and refined in collaboration with researchers from the other centers, consisting of 13 questions and a five-point Likert scale, with the overall score ranging from 13 to 65 points, in which the higher the score, the greater the adherence. Statistical analysis was performed using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), considering p<0.05 as significant. Results: an improvement in the adherence score was observed over the weeks. When compared with the score obtained before the intervention, there was a significant improvement in adherence in the last two weeks (p<0.001). Conclusion: the intervention using messages sent by cell phone showed to be effective in promoting adherence to individual protection practices against COVID-19. However, the observed sample loss may have affected the results, limiting the generalizability of the findings. Therefore, the effects identified should be interpreted with caution. The Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (RBR-2s94rb).
Evidências de validade da versão brasileira da Assessment Interprofessional Collaborative Leadership Scale
Natalia Dalforno da Silva, Geisa Colebrusco de Souza Gonçalves, Jaqueline Alcantara Marcelino da Si...
Objective: to seek evidence of validity of the Assessment Interprofessional Collaborative Leadership Scale for Brazilians, in Portuguese, and to analyze evidence of content, response process and internal structure. Method: psychometric evaluation study, with translation, back-translation, and evaluation by a committee of experts regarding linguistic and content equivalence. The pre-test was carried out with 40 participants and, subsequently, the final version was applied to 318 health workers. Exploratory factor analysis and reliability testing were performed using Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega. Results: in the content validation, four items presented scores below the critical value. Of the participants, the majority were nurses (81%) and physiotherapists (10%), and were female (79%). The factorability obtained was Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin = 0.94 and Bartlett’s sphericity = 2991.4 with p < 0.05. Parallel analysis indicated a one-dimensional model, with variance explained by 63.71%. The model’s adequacy indices showed satisfactory levels. And adequate reliability indices (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.97 and McDonald’s omega = 0.97). Conclusion: the Interprofessional Collaborative Leadership Assessment Scale, with a unidimensional structure and 28 items, presented good evidence of content validity, response process and internal structure, considered adequate to measure interprofessional collaborative leadership.